The headline read "Russell Brand May Have Started A Revolution". Hogmuffins. The piece regarded Brand being interviewed by BBC's Jeremy Paxman (known for his "forthright and abrasive interviewing style") about being the guest editor for The New Statesman's recent revolution-themed issue. Paxman asked, and rightly so, what qualifies Brand for this. The interview just goes awry from there. It ends with Brand being dramatically passionate about the state of the world. OK...so he's lucid enough to understand, like most of the rest of the world, that things need to change. He's vocal about what ...but not about how . He rants about social injustice, wealth disparity, etc...but makes no statements regarding how to go about solving the problems. A friend sent me the article this morning and this was my reply (for the most part): "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." ...
Short stories, essays, ramblings, musings, and other such nonsense.